Wednesday, May 12, 2010

Are we really worried about Earth, or our Reputation?


Some how, maybe it's because of movies like "Inconvenient Truth" (we love movies) or maybe it's because of gorgeous actors standing in front of the cameras talking to us about the importance of the environment, that it's become a fashion trend to suddenly care about the Earth. But the importance of educated input is shot down. Much like how it's 'cool' to worry about humanitarian causes, almost as important as looking cool, so we shop at the GAP... knowing that it's clothing is manufactured by practically in-human child labour factories.
Somewhere, personal responsibility and logic has been replaced by Youtube and Wikipedia.
What do I mean?
Well, let's look at the lineup of "alternative" sources of energy.
Hydrogen fueled cars. Where do we get hydrogen from? A process called Electrolysis, where a tremendous amount of electricity is applied to water, splitting it's molecular structure (2x hydrogen and 1 part oxygen) into oxygen and hydrogen. Sure, the part you always hear is, when you burn hydrogen it emits only pure, clean water. But the big question is...
does it not require a HUGE amount of power to do this? And for such a little amount of fuel?

Kind of like saying, "if I want to make my 1 kilometer walk to the store more efficient, I should first walk 3 kilometers in a semicircle. Once I get there, it's only half of kilometer from there." It makes no logical sense! But instead of educating ourselves on the process, we watch Youtube videos and Wikipedia, which tells us, "C'mon. It's only half the distance from your new point, doesn't that sound better?"


Windmills.
Windmills for alternative power sources in a broad sense works. Using wind power (which is going to blow around anyways) sounds like a viable idea. But there are two major problems with this.
#1: You are disrupting the natural patterns of wind flow over the planet. Creating pockets of hot / cold air, which would be otherwise following a route in it's natural path. Creating pockets of slower wind flow in large areas, as we would need fields of these things to make a dent in our consumption. So, good alternative...fail.
#2: These towers create a large amount of low frequency sound which has proven to affect humans in very negative ways. Creating illnesses ranging from nausea and hallucinations to persistent flu-like symptoms. Also, evidence shows that even small, intermittent exposure to such frequencies actually drive natural wildlife to go mad. Bears exposed to planes flying overhead for minutes, or even seconds have suffered from a madness that has caused bear attacks and violent behavior among themselves as they suffer from the same symptoms as humans. A sense of nausea, panic and hallucinations have driven herds of these animals to maul other animals for no apparent reason, each other and even humans, where no attacks have previously been recorded.

Hydrogen...
Must I say more? If you know anything about physics, it's basic science that you can't get out of ANY system, electrical or mechanical, more than you put in. Actually, it's much less. Think of a light bulb. Electricity goes in, ideally for one thing... creating light. But that's not all it creates. A lot of energy is simply wasted creating heat. A small amount of energy is used to actually create that which we want, light, and a massive amount is wasted creating heat. Even heat lamps and hair dryers. You plug one in wanting heat, and you get a red glow. Light... not what you wanted, but that's what happens. Any time you convert one sources of energy into another, you are WASTING a huge amount of power.

Solar cells...
Probably the most efficient of all alternative power sources. These are great for sparse, personal use, but let's stop and think of what they are. High gloss, black panels. As an alternative power sources for mass consumption, we again (like windmills) would need fields of these panels to power our cities. Heating the air above them, not only do they drive any residual pollutants higher into our atmosphere, they would, once again, disrupt natural wind patterns terribly. Huge pockets of unnaturally heated air would stop weather patterns in their tracks and create weather phenomena that could be devastating.

And any mix of these on a large scale would cause natural disasters unlike we've ever seen.
So what do we do?
I know this might sound elementary, but seriously, we can't change the fact that what we do is harmful to our planet. You can't really change the impact of our use, but we can change our use of what we have.
Walk to the store, instead of finding new ways to power our vehicles to drive there.
Stop the constant drives out to the country, to 'take it in.' Take a bicycle, or simply not go as much. Why are we saying the planet is so important to us, just to pour all this waste into it, put up a tent and say "Ah, yes. We love nature."
Flying is a HUGE problem. I flew to the Bahamas to take it in, when on the plane, I realised, 'wait a second, I'm pouring thousands of pounds of chemical waste directly into the atmosphere at around 35,000 feet to enjoy the planet?'

The simple answer to our problem is, do we NEED to do this? I know some people say they "Need" to get away, but seriously, do you really NEED it? Are we so mentally unstable that we NEED to get away? Or is it a really bad want?
I think a lot of our problems in the North-American society is that most of our wants seem so attainable, possibly even accessible, that we trick ourselves into seeing them as needs. After all, our actually needs are pretty much met and we don't even recognise them. And when wants are taken for needs, be prepared for a huge amount of waste.

Is the environment really as important to us as we think it is? If so, our problem isn't new power sources, the problem is us. Our confusion over wants=needs, and vise-versa.

And when we come to our honest conclusion, let's be honest with ourselves, and the planet.
Do we NEED this? And go from there... then we can say we truly care.
Otherwise, let's be brutally honest. We really WANT our wants, or "need" our wants, and really that's what's important. Realise this and shut up!

Why can't we stop these games?
Why can't we stop turning serious, real issues into fashion statements and movements? Why can't we just take personal responsibility?
I just don't have that answer.

3 comments:

  1. Know what, this crossed my mind before as well, about how much power we put into getting hydrogen fuel and how we need to get that power to do it. same as recycling, i do wish to see the stats on exactly, how much checmicals and environmental destruction is caused through the recycling processes compaired to just cutting down another swath of trees (and if we planted behind the lines we would have an everlasting supply as they should mature before we finish clearcutting the continent and we can start over).
    personally what i need is to get out of the damn city once in a while, i haven't since before 2000, just to go camping, what stops me? well, it's a social problem, we're always rush rush because that is what we humans made our society into, wanna go camping for a weekend in kenore but you live in winnipeg? well you gotta drive out there for 2 hours spend 2 days and drive back, what do you do out there? have campfires, HIKE! fish etc.. and just be away from the stink and stress of the big city and enjoy nature without noise and pollution and maniacs of the big city. now, personally, i wouldn't mind hiking to the region from the city to enjoy a few days and hike back, i mean, hey part of what we would do there is hike anyways right? why don't i? simple, when i can afford to get gear and food etc.. together to go camping, i haven't the time, and when i do have the time, it's because i am layed off, broke and can't eat anything but kraft dinner, rahman noodles and peanut butter jam sandwaiches for the month, if society was different, i would have gone on a good hike to go camping for a week and hike back, at least once every summer the past 10 years, so since i have no gas guzzling, pollution spewing car, i just can't get it done with society as is. i may be posting anonymous but i'm sure that TruthinessDotCom knows who i am.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Recycling does use a fair bit of energy, but it actually uses less to reycle them than to fabricate the new material. For example, recycling a tin can uses about 95% of the energy it would take to process raw materials into new. BUT the down side is, here in Winnipeg, our recycling program is based on how much money is generated from re-selling the recycled goods. For example, we "recycle" glass wears and jars (supposedly when we put it in our Blue Boxes), but the market for recycled glass is not very profitable and the glass products end up in the land fill. And the majority of our recycling is with paper. Which can be somewhat profitable as the material is sold back to paper mills for news print. Now this is a bit of a 'Catch-22" because the demand for this end product (which is made into news print) has dropped dramatically, so again, a growing volume of paper we put into our Blue Boxes is actually tossed into the land fill. The other side is that this means less paper is being used for News papers and flyers to begin with, so less use, less waste and even less energy being used to process the material, bad side is the majority of paper we 'recycle' is thrown into the garbage dump.

    ReplyDelete
  3. lots of good points made there!! The issue with all the alternative power sources does begin and end at scale. On a small scale (such as individual use) solar panels and windmills work really well. But you bring up a lot of the downside in trying to convert these into large scale operations.

    Ultimately we need to reduce our consumption. There is no way to replace our energy use with something else that won't cause equivalent problems. Currently, it seems that only a small percentage of the world's population is voluntarily taking steps to reduce their energy usage and I think that steps will ultimately need to be make by governments before we see a change. The changes needed are so drastic that most people aren't interested in changing their ways and need to be forced to recognize our finite resources.

    ReplyDelete